McCulloh, Henry Eustace Folder 1K
0
r J
W. J. F. FENTON
GENEALOGIST
Member of the Association of Genealogists and Record Agents
14
82 HERSHAM-ROAD
WALTON=ON-THAMES
SURREY KT12 SNU
ENGLAND
Tel.: Walton -on -Thames 21214
Saturday, 31st October 1981
Mrs Alice H. Eidson,
1135, Kenvood Street,
Winston-Salem, N.C.
U.S.A. 27103
Dear Mrs. Eidson,
Thank you for your letter of 2nd September with its
enclosures.
I write to say that agter rather a long haul I have found the
Will of Henry Eustace McCULLOH. It is dated 1st Nov. 1803 and
was proved at London in April 1812 by Udell McCULLOH his widow and
relict. An abstract, including an abstract also df the Estate
Duty records, is enclosed, You will no doubt be much interested
in all this (as I was), not least by the reference in the first
Codicil to the 2600,000 compensation paid by the U.S:A. and in which
H.E. McC, hoped to share. It looks as though he had not received
any of it by the time he died as'the Estate Duty records show that
his effects were 'Sworn under 23,500'.
In the light of the second codicil we do not know.where
Henry Eustace was buried. Looks as though it might well be St. John
at Hackney, in which parish I think itA s that Clapton, Middx lies.
However, his Memorial Inscription, if any , could be informative and
I will try to find it. Udell might also be buried in the same grave.
I have called up the original of Henry Eustace's Will as I
feel sure you would like to have a photo -copy of it. I will order one
and let you have it when it comes to hand - this may take about 6 weeks.
TheVill and Codicils are quite short and so the copy should not be too
wxpensive.
(a)
Now, of course, this disposes of two earlier questions:
Udall or Udell WEST - She.was evidently Henry Eustaee'.s wife and
they were married in 1790.
..... / ( b )
fto 2-
R
(b) Extraction of Duplin County Minutes - If correctly. extracted I
of April 1786 referring to think this must imply
Henry Eustaoe as decd, confusion in the original
document between Henry Eustace
and his father. As we know,
Hrfery Eustace was his father's
agent in America.
(c) Henry Eustace's Will does not mention any children of his. We
do not know how old Udell was when he married her. Her Will
might resolve this question of whether they had any children.
With referencetb para 2 of your letter of 2nd Sept. and the
question of the slaves,the extract of thepuplin County Court records for
January 1790 refers to slaves being divided between Penelope, Catherine
and Henry children of James McCULLOH. I agree that our information �S
that Henry Eustace, son of James and Elizabeth was not born till 18061
but they had a daughter Henrietta; could your searcher who abstracted
the Court records have read an abbreviation of Henrietta as Henry? If
so this would bring things back into line. For my part I incline
to the view that the James who died in Rowan Countyin 1810' and whom I
estimate was born (in America?) about 1750 is the James referred to
in Henry's Will of 1779. Our problem is that that Will does not define
what relationship (if any) that James was to him (Henry McCULLOH).
I think the answer (if there is one to be found) probably lies in
America.
Apart from looking for a record of Henry Eustace's burial and
possible memorial and for a Will of Udall/Udell McCULLOH I will not
do anything more at this end until I hear from you.
• I enclose an accoubt to cover the work referred to in this
letter and will let you have the photo --copy of Henry Eusatce's Will
when I get it.
With all best wishes,
Yours sincerely,
W,7F� en m�i�
McCULLOH - Search for burial of Henry Eustace McCULLOH
late of Clapton, Middx.
Guildhall Library - 6th Nov. 1981
1. It seemed likely that Henry Eustace McCULLOH was buried at
St. John -at -Hackney. The -burial register of that church was searched
back from April 1812. This yielded:
29 February 1812 Buried Henry Euston McCULLOH - Aged 69.
S') 1S
2. Obituaries in the Gentelman's Magazine were also searched
in 1812, 1813 and 1814 but a referenceto Henry Eustace McCULLOH
was not found.
Cav►e
County pubVIC Ubrary
�Aoeksvil'�, NG
W. J. F. FENTON
82, H ERSHAM ROAD,
WALTON-ON THAM ES;
SURREY, KT12 5NU.
1
La
McCULLOH - Search for burial of Henry Eustace McCULLOH
late of ClaptonMiddx.
Guildhall Library - 6th Nov. 1981
1. It seemed likely that Henry Eustace McCULLOH was buried at
St. John -at -Hackney. The -burial register of that church was searched
back from April 1812. This yielded:
29 February 1812 Buried Henry Euston McCULLOH - Aged 69.
Sty) � Sw
2. Obituaries in the Gentelman's Magazine were also searched
in 1812, 1813 and 1814 but a reference to Henry Eustace McCULLOH
was not found.
W. J. F. FENTON
82, H ERSHAM ROAD,
WALTON-ON THAMES
SURREY, KT12 5NU.
4
W. J. F. FENTON
GENEALOGIST
Member of the Association of Genealogists and Record Agents
82 HERSHAM ROAD
WALTON=ON-THAMES
SURREY KT12 5NU
ENGLAND
Tel.: Walton -on -Thames 25214
Saturday, 31st October 1981
Mrs Alice H. Eidson,
1135, Kenvood Street,
Winston-Salem, N.C.
U.S.A. 27103
I
Dear Mrs. Eidson,
Thank you for your letter of 2nd September with its
enclosures.
I write to say that agter rather a long haul I have found the
Will of Henry Eustace McCULLOH. It is dated 1st Nov. 1803 and
was proved at London in April 1812 by Udell McCULLOH his widow and
relict. An abstract, including an abstract also df the Estate �O,ii�QQ
Duty records, is enclosed, You will no doubt be much interested "1
in all this (as I was), not least by the reference in the first
Codicil to the L600,000 compensation paid by the U.S.A. and in which
H.E. McC,hoped to share. It looks as though he had not received
any of it by the time he died as the Estate Duty records show that
his effects were 'Sworn under 93,500'.
In the light of the second codicil we do not know where
Henry Eustace was buried. Looks as though it might well be St. John
at Hackney, in which parish I think i tis that Clapton, Middx lies.
However, his Memorial Inscription, if any , could be informative and
I will try to find it. Udell might also be buried in the same grave.
I have called up the original of Henry Eustace's Will as I
feel sure you would like to have a photo -copy of it. I will order one
and let you have it when it comes to hand - this may take about 6 weeks.
The'+ill and Codicils are quite short and so the copy should not be too
expensive.
Now, of course, this disposes of two earlier questions:
(a) Udall or Udell WEST - She was evidently Henry Eustace's wife and
they were married in 1790.
..... / (b)
1<2.-16 �;outlty Public Ubrary-
Mocksville, NC
2-
(b) Extraction of Duplin County Minutes
of April 1786 referring to
Henry Eustace as decd,
If correctly extracted I
think this must imply
confusion in the original
document between Henry Eustace
and his father. As we know,
Hnfery Eustace was his father's
agent in America.
(c) Henry Eustace's Will does not mention any children of his. We
do not know how old Udell was when he married her. Her Will
might resolve this question of whether they had any children.
With referenceto para 2 of your letter of 2nd Sept. and the
question of the slaves,the extract of the�uplin County Court records for
January 1790 refers to slaves being divided between Penelope, Catherine
and Henry children of James McCULLOH. I agree that our information 0
that Henry Eustace, son of James and Elizabeth was not born till 18o6,
but they had a daughter Henrietta; could your searcher who abstracted
the Court records have read an abbreviation of Henrietta as Henry? If
so this would bring things back into line. For my part I incline
to the view that the James who died in Rowan Countyin 1816 and whom I
estimate was born (in America?) about 1750 is the James referred to
in Henry's Will of 1779. Our problem is that that Will does not define
what relationship (if any) that James was to him (Henry McCULLOH).
I think the answer (if there is one to be found) probably lies in
America.
Apart from looking for a record of Henry Eustace's burial and
possible memorial and for a Will of Udall/Udell McCULLOH I will not
do anything more at this end until I hear from you.
I enclose an accouht to cover the work referred to in this
letter and will let you have the photo -copy of Henry Lusatce's Will
when I get it.
With all best wishes,
Yours sincerely,
McCULLO(C)H - Search for a PCC Will ofHenry Eustace McCULLOH Dost 1779
PRO Wills Room - 24th Sept. 1981 and 2nd Oct 1981
and 29th Oct. 1981
1. The Calendars were searched from1779 to 1810 inclusive. This
yielded the following:
Year
Wills
1779
James McCULLOCH - Surrey
- April - 162
Henry McCULLOH - Esq, Pts
- Middx
July - 313
(This is the reference to
the Will of
Henry McCULLOH who died
at Turnham
Green, a copy of which
has already
been obtained.)
1780
Nil
1781
David McCULLOCK - Pts -
Aug. - 397
1782
David McCULLOCK - Pts -
July - 366
1783
Henry Mc COLLUM )
otherwise ) Pts-,-
Oct. No folio
McCULLUM )
number entered.
1784
Nil
1785
Nil
1786
David McCULLOCH - Lane
- Jan. - No folio no.
entered
1787
Nil
1788
John McCULLOCH - London
- Nov..- No folio no.
entered
1789
Robert McCULLOH -- Kent
- June - 326
1790 -
1798 Nil
1799
Anne McCULLOGH - Dublin
- Apr. - 297
James McCULLOCH - Middx
- Oct. - 792
1800
- 1810 Nil
Admons
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Henry McCULLAGH-
Surrey - March
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
2. This search was extended on 29th Oct.' and the Will of Henry Eustace
McCULLOH was found in 1812. See abstract at fo. McC/9
rl
01.E -j
D
N
J
h
J
McCULLOH - Abstract of the Will of HenryEustace McCULLOH
dated 1st Nov. 1 03
PRO, Chancery Lane - 29th October 1981
PRO Ref: PROB/11 / r" �W OPY-61i,
ICU?
1. Will of Henry Eustace McCULLOH "now of Lincoln's Inn Fields,
Parish of St.Giles-in-the-Fields, co. Middlesex" - usual pious
preamble - Body to be buried in the family grave in church yard of
Chiswick Parish Church, Middlesex decently and without any unnecessary
expense. Executrix to have a close stone tomb or cenataph built
round and over the present grave to enclose the limitsof it and to
preserve it.
Everything of which the testator died possessed is left to
wife Udell McCULLOH who is appointed residuary legateeald'Execuf;rix.
Dated: 1st November 1803.
signed Henry E. McCulloh
Witnesses: Wm THOMPSON, 121 Holborn
Francis Gore BERRY, --do--
1st Codieil dated 29th March 1805
This refers to the 9600,000 paid to the British Govt. by the
United States of America for benegit of British Creditors for debts
lost by them in America and which sum was to be distributed by a
Commission appointed for the�urpose. The codicil confirms that
any sums coming tothe.testator were given to his wife as in the original
Will.
signed Henry E. McCulloh.
No witnesses.
2nd Codicil dated 9thMay 1807
Thi®-revokesthe.directions to his Executrix about the tomb and
emphasises that no unnecessary expense is to be incurred and
says that if the testator dies at some distance from Chiswick
he is to be buried where he dies anis body is not to be carried
to Chiswick. '
signed Henry E. McCulloh
No witnesses.
PROVED at London withttwo codicils 6th April 1812 by Udell McCULLOH
the widow and relict, etc, etc to whom administration was granted.
2. The corresponding Estate Duty Registers - PRO Series IR26 - were
1
90- / examined
G dav a County Public Ubraf +
Mocksville, NC
• McCULLOH - Search for burial of.Henry Eustace McCULLOH
late of Clapton, Middx.
Guildhall Library - 6th Nov. 1981
1. It seemed likely that Henry Eustace McCULLOH was buried at
St. John -at -Hackney. The -.burial register of that church was searched
back from April 1812. This yielded:
29 February 1812 Buried Henry Euston McCULLOH - Aged 69.
t SLt,
2. Obituaries in the Gentelmants Magazine were also searched
in 1812, 1813 and 1814 but a reference 1n Henry Eustace McCULLOH
was; not found.
W. J. F. FENTON
82, H ERSHAM ROAD,
WALTON-ON -THAM ES
SURREY, KT12 5NU.
Cour►ty Public Ubrdcy'
mooksville, NC
i
McCULLOH - Search for a Will of Udell Udall KcCULLOH,
widow ry of HenEustace McCULLOH.
PRO - 6th November 1981
We have no clue to her age nor to the date and plasters e of hat er death.
Search was therefore made in twDeath
searchedeoverJthe period 1813
the PRO;
their reference 1827. These ere
to 1838. The only reference to McCULLOH in that time was:
1816 Francis McCULLOH - Extrix Eleanor d StCULLOHWof
Ormond proved PCC -
IR26 Ref: 2/284.
W. J. F. FENTON
82, H ERSHAM ROAD,
WALTON-ONTHAM ES
SURREY, KT12 5NU•
iV Public t�b�ary
[VocksVilfe, No
W. J. F. FENTON
GENEALOGIST
Member of the Association of Genealogists and Record Agents
82 HERSHAM ROAD
WALTON-ON-THAMES
Mrs. Alice H. Eidson, SURREY KT12 5NU
1135, Kenwood Street, ENGLAND
Winston—Salem, Tel.: Walton -on -Thames 25214
N. Carolina,
T.S.A. 27103• 3rd February, 1982
Dear Mrs. Eidson,
Many thanks for your letter of 12th November last and for details
of the information you found from your State Archives.
My two sons decided to get married within six weeks of each other
in October and November last, then there was Christmas and now we have a
Rail strike, all of which have made their various contributions to delaying
my work. Also, I shall be abroad from 8th February until 23rd March, so
I have been trying hard during the past few weeks to get this report away
to you before I go.
I enclose the following individual reports, photocopies, etc, with
comments:-
Fo. Mc.10 - This reports a search of St. John at Hackney, Burials, which
found Henry Eustace buried there 29th February, 1812, aged 69.
This age must in error as it would put his date of birth at
1742. However, on the evidence before us, his admission to
Middle Temple in 1757; his being called to the Bar in 1760 and
his going to America in 1740 as an infant, must, I think, be
taken together to mean that he was born about 1?38, which fits
with information.we have about his brother James and sister
Penelope, both of whom it seems, must have been born in America.
This folio also reports that I was unable to find an Obituary
Notice for him in "The Gentleman's Magazine".
Fo. Mc.11 - I had a look for a Will of Henry Eustace's widow, Udall, but
did not find any out to 1838. But, of course, we have no idea
how old Udall was. If she was a young woman when enry Eustace
married her in 1?90, she could have survived until something
like 1845/50 perhaps, though this seems a bit unlikely. How-
ever, more research will be needed to find her.
Fo. Mc.12 - As promised in mine of 31st October last, I called up the original
A & B Wikl of Henry Eustace and a -photocopy of it is at this folio
number Mc. 12/A. This is interesting on several counts
among which are, first of course, it contains his signature
and, secondly, it was sealed with an Armorial Seal. This was
Davi County Public Library
Mocksvilie, NC
Mrs. Alice g2
• Eidson.
rather damaged and I
of what I could CO�-d not decipher all
"a Fret En make out is attached. °f it but a sketch
an Arrow grailled the Crest appeared to be r�
of these blazoned Motto read 'r An Arm Throwing
st
Armo tt details with those recorded i "0
rY for McCULI,OCg Comparison
showed that (see photocopy of Burke n Burkes General
With + whilst the Arms of : Page 637 herewith
any of those given in B the Seal do not match exactly,
noteworthyBurke, the
E!shtaXccC'jLLOCRs
point being that all the By areverysimilar. T e of Scotland urke Arms are associated
s connection.through and does appear to
• Grogan in Ireland, ugh his father strengthen Henry
a descend and, who, accordin : with the James of
ant of some Scottish McC to the IREDELI, Memoirs
ri is all it stuff" CLLOCHs. � was
directly and interesting, gOWeVer, whilst this
Y at this time, but we g' I do not think it helps us
FO* Mc.14 _ should keep it in mind.
I then tri ed
mentioned in to find Henry Eustace_.s
letter of Jud,
examined fin our State Archives reference to p Y' 1803,
all of which ' PRO references A012/34, A012/117R4_T'?9/115. I
dealings referred to g' al records reand A012/10
g with ori in9
circa 1 the to
Loyalist regarding Hen '
?83. At the Yalist Claims Commission i Eustace's
Of those of folio mentioned London,
I'did mY findings which I in the margin, I
and I do°tocopy' pa es 232 fof felt of most interest ive to tails
not think g 224 to
this stn � it is worth the 41334 but this is bulkyYou.
stage. I did not find Hen cost of mailing
Papers, nor Henry Eustace's Di g zt to You at
birth and education document giving details of his Diploma amongst the
Fo. Mc -15 - Ase England. Place and date of
arch was made in
letters in that file of0pff79/115 and
one from Henryce Co 'ongst the photocopies of
rEustace to Mr. pies of Letters of 180
Claims Commission HAY of the American Lo 3 was the
enclosing his Di ' dated 1st July';. 1803 CMc. 1 Loyalist
tion in Plima from which will a 5/2), saying he was
Middle England". . I have a app my birth and educa-
ple but the gain checked with the Librarian at
Henry Eustace other repeat that they have no
1981 (FO. Mc/3)• an that given in their letter ormation_about
copy of I must
confess that of 22nd July,
it wo Henry Eustace's Diploma t even if they had had
uld, itself, have recorded Would
not have thought that
we seek. I thinkinformation he
and I will do it might be worth a said and which
this after m further search in PRO A01
if you wish. Y return here at the end of Mar 3/11?
March,
find S° s in spite of quite a lot
a statement about Henryore effort
However, at this a mEustace's "birth ' we have not been able to
Age, I think we should avoid ore education m in tEngland"
than modest .
xpendi tore
-3 -
Mrs. Alice H. Eidson.
on the background of Henry Eustace and his father.
in mine of 19th A I believe, as I mentioned
August, 1981, that the principal object of your attention should
be James MCCULLOH, whose Will, dated June, 181+, was proved in 1816 in Rowan
County. Do you know his age at death and where he is buried? If not can
You discover? His age at death would enable us to form a fairly accurate estimate
of his date of birth and this would help identification.
As I understand it, you do not know, at this time, whether that
James was born in America or was an immigrant. Do you know whether his
marriage took place in America? I presume you have not, so far, managed
to discover this.
Did you manage to date the "Life and Correspondence of James IREDELL"?
The reason why I ask is because those Memoirs mentioned on page 5, a James
MCCULLOH (son of William) "now of Camdey near Dundalk in Ireland.... who is
yet a bachelor". Looking at a sketch pedigree of McCULLO(C)H I compiled from
those Memoirs, I wondered if the James'who died in Rowan County in 1816 was
the James of Camdey. The date of "now of*Camdey" and "yet a bachelor" would
help to prove or disprove that idea.
An account for the researches dealt with in this letter is enclosed.
I will not do anything more until I have your observations and fresh direc-
tions. With best wishes for 1982,
Yours sincerely,
Will.
l�
W. J. F. Fenton,
Davie County Public library
Mooksvft, NC
McCULLGH - Some searches at the P.R.O., Kew, into the American
Loyalist Claims Commission.
2nd December, 1981 - P.R.O. Reference: A.0.12/34, pages 215 and 228, etc.
P. 215 -
To the Commissioners appointed by the Act of Parliament for Enquiring into
the losses and services of the American Loyalists.
4The Memorial of Henry Eustace MCCULLQH:,Esquire late of North Carolina'
"Shtweth that your Memorialist is a Barrister -at -Law and was for several
years an inhabitant and a member of H.M. Honourable Council of Collectors
of Newborn and Edenton in North Carolina and afterwards Agent for the said
Province and that he has been throughout life uniformly loyal and attached
to the British Government.
That he resided in America upwards of thirteen years and was'at New York
in 1?78 where finding he could not be suffered to remain in North Carolina
but in the detested conditions of taking the oaths to the rebel Government
and becoming an active Agent against this country he determined, though
strongly invited to return, to leave his property in North Carolina to the
manifest hazard of destruction (the same having been conditionally confiscAted
in December, 1777) and to prefer his duty to God and to his lawful King
and Government and hi8 claim to the rights and to the protection promised
him as a loyal subject above all other considerations........ to
.1
.....that he laid such his determination before their Excellencies the Commander -
in -Chief and the Royal Commissioners and was honoured with their warm alb -
probation and that he in consequence left America with the Commissioners and
has taken refuge in England ever since and he humbly submits that such his
conduct was at that time of considerable weight and much attended to as he
was generally known to be a person of very large property and as having long
been in a public character and situation which gave him a right to be
acquainted with public matters...... 'r
......that your Memorialist's late father Henry MCCULLOH'_; esquire was en-
titled and possessed of near eight hundred thousand acres of land in North
Carolina subject to a condition of forfeiture as to all such parts thereof
as should not be settled within a limited period in the proportion of one
white person to every two hundred acres. That his late Majesty King George
II by his Royal Order in Council dated 13th October, 1756 was pleased to
extend the term of the said settlement to the 25th March, 1760.4
Henry Eustace McCULLOH did not make the smallest claim to any part of his
father's said estate but that he held and claims part of the lands reserved
as aforesaid under Deeds from his father in his lifetime (confirmed to him by
his father's Will and by Articles of Agreement) etc.
.....respecting the nature and value of your Memorialist's lands he thinks
it absolutely necessary to entreat your attention to the following brief
particulars:- That they did not lie in great and extensive bodies but
consisted of several hundred distinct tracts or surveys interspersed in
eleven counties generally from two to three hundred acres in a survey and laid
cc
U Z
X3
th
0 0
U
a;
out and fitted to the greatest advantage with wood, water and soil for
farms or plantations and ready for immediate occupancy. # .....etc.
n
....in 1761/2 and 3, the average price at which they sold (and then thought
very high) was from 1 to 2 and 3 shillings an acre. In less than 10 years
after he readily sold for 5 shillings to 10 and 17 shillings the acre and
an average price at which he now estimated his. lands is about or under 8
shillings sterling an acre.tt
A7
.....that in the course of ten years prior to the rebellion their property
in Carolina averaged them more than X1,800 sterling a year, nett, in London.
That in 1778, from a total failure of remittances, they were necessitated
to apply to the Government for temporary relief and had E100 per year
ordered them.#
That your Memorialist's father is now dead and your Memorialist is allowed
";300 a year which is all support and part payment of the interest of his
debts here which exceed all his British property.41
�'o**
There then follows a reference to two Schedules A and B, submitted with
he Claim and outlining the property involved and an assessment of its value.
This submission ends "Your Memorialist therefore humbly prays that he may
be .... etc, etc.
Signed Henry E. Mc(: JULLOH-'
Hampton Wick, 5th November, 1783."
p. 228 -
On this page on which the evidence actually begins, there is the following
statement:- '?-•
co
He (Henry Eustace McCULLO H ). was a native of London, went to America as an
infant in .1740. From 1761-1767 was a member of the Council and an Officer v_
of the Crown. From 1767-1772, was in England. Went back to America again ---a
in 1772 and returned to England in 1773. Went back to New York in July, 177 -
and returned to England later in 1778. c ch.
0 0
v
m
Ialso examined P.R.O. reference A.O. 13/117. This appeared to contain the •�
original papers connected with Henry Eustace McCULLO%H's.efforts to support co
his Claim and, inter alfa, contains a detailed list of lands lying in the
counties of Guildford, Anson and Rowan in North Carolina, the property of
Henry Eustace McCULLOH _ left for sale in the hands of Thomas Frohock Esquire,
his Attorney in fact, with the lowest prices affixed to each tract at which
he is empowered to dispose of the same - Rowan County, 20th May, 1773.
There were also, in this collection, some letters from one signing B. M.
McCULLOCZ (I think this must be Benjamin McCULLOCH - W.J.F.F.). These were
addressed to Henry Eustace as "Dear Cousin" and dated around 1784. I did
not discover any sign_ of the certificate of Henry Eustace McCULLOtfi'is: birth
or baptism in London amongst these papers but it seems probable that this
would be found in P.R.O. reference T.79/115. These are Treasury papers and
are a collection of correspondence and I am arranging to get them examined.
14c=
out and fitted to the greatest advantage with wood, water and soil for
farms or plantations and ready for immediate occupancy. # .....etc.
n
....in 1761/2 and 3, the average price at which they sold (and then thought
very high) was from 1 to 2 and 3 shillings an acre. In less than 10 years
after he readily sold for 5 shillings to 10 and 17 shillings the acre and
an average price at which he now estimated his. lands is about or under 8
shillings sterling an acre.tt
A7
.....that in the course of ten years prior to the rebellion their property
in Carolina averaged them more than X1,800 sterling a year, nett, in London.
That in 1778, from a total failure of remittances, they were necessitated
to apply to the Government for temporary relief and had E100 per year
ordered them.#
That your Memorialist's father is now dead and your Memorialist is allowed
";300 a year which is all support and part payment of the interest of his
debts here which exceed all his British property.41
�'o**
There then follows a reference to two Schedules A and B, submitted with
he Claim and outlining the property involved and an assessment of its value.
This submission ends "Your Memorialist therefore humbly prays that he may
be .... etc, etc.
Signed Henry E. Mc(: JULLOH-'
Hampton Wick, 5th November, 1783."
p. 228 -
On this page on which the evidence actually begins, there is the following
statement:- '?-•
co
He (Henry Eustace McCULLO H ). was a native of London, went to America as an
infant in .1740. From 1761-1767 was a member of the Council and an Officer v_
of the Crown. From 1767-1772, was in England. Went back to America again ---a
in 1772 and returned to England in 1773. Went back to New York in July, 177 -
and returned to England later in 1778. c ch.
0 0
v
m
Ialso examined P.R.O. reference A.O. 13/117. This appeared to contain the •�
original papers connected with Henry Eustace McCULLO%H's.efforts to support co
his Claim and, inter alfa, contains a detailed list of lands lying in the
counties of Guildford, Anson and Rowan in North Carolina, the property of
Henry Eustace McCULLOH _ left for sale in the hands of Thomas Frohock Esquire,
his Attorney in fact, with the lowest prices affixed to each tract at which
he is empowered to dispose of the same - Rowan County, 20th May, 1773.
There were also, in this collection, some letters from one signing B. M.
McCULLOCZ (I think this must be Benjamin McCULLOCH - W.J.F.F.). These were
addressed to Henry Eustace as "Dear Cousin" and dated around 1784. I did
not discover any sign_ of the certificate of Henry Eustace McCULLOtfi'is: birth
or baptism in London amongst these papers but it seems probable that this
would be found in P.R.O. reference T.79/115. These are Treasury papers and
are a collection of correspondence and I am arranging to get them examined.
o4
-3-
I also examined P.R.O. reference A.O. 12/109 - these are the proceedings of
the Commissioners.of the American Claims under th-e Acts of 23rd, 25th, 26th,
27th, 28th and 29th, George III and contain the reports and statements by
the said Commissioners, the names of the Claimants and the amount of their
Claims and the liquidation thereof. The following appears under Certificate
No. 433:
Name of Claimant:
Province:
Claim for Loss of Property:
Sums Originally Allowed:
Sum as Allowed on Revision:
Percentage to be Deducted per Act of
Parliament:
Total Sum Payable under Act of
Parliament:
Sum Already Received:
Balance After Such Receipt:
Deduction on Account of Pension:
Final Balance:
which amount it would appear, was paid.
H. E. MCCULLOH. -
North Carolina.
z 54,265
.t 18,030
No Entry
fu 803. 16. o.
-t 17,234. 4. o.
Z 51411. 8. o.
fu 111822. 16. o.
f, 75.
t 11,747. 16. 0.
There were also references to a James McCULLOCH of South Carolina,
Certificate No. 430, who claimed X1,827 and got E513. 14. 0. (I am
doubtful if this McCULLOCH is anything to do with Henry Eustace - W.J.F.F.).
W. J. F. FENTON
82, H F RSHAM ROAD)
`1t1ALTON-ON-THAM E.S
SURREY. KT12 5NU.
W. J. F. FENTON
GENEALOGIST
Member of the Association of Genealogists and Record Agents
82 HERSHAM ROAD
WALTON-ON-THAMES
Mrs. Alice H. Eidson, SURREY KT12 5NU
1135, Kenwood Street, ENGLAND
Winston—Salem, Tel.: Walton -on -Thames 25214
N. Carolina,
T.S.A. 27103. 3rd February, 1982
Dear Mrs. Eidson,
Many thanks for your letter of 12th November last and for details
of the information you found from your State Archives.
My two sons decided to get married within six weeks of each other
in October and November last, then there was Christmas and now we have a
Rail strike, all of which have made their various contributions to delaying
my work. Also, I shall be abroad from 8th February until 23rd March, so
I have been trying hard during the past few weeks to get this report away
to you before I go.
V
V
I enclose the following individual reports, photocopies, etc, with
4-
comments:-
Fo.
Mc.10 - This reports a search of St. John at Hackney, Burials, which
found Henry Eustace buried there 29th February, 1812, aged 69.
This age must in error as it would put his date of birth at
1742. However, on the evidence before us, his admission to
N.
Middle Temple in 1?57; his being called to the Bar in 1760 and
his going to America in 1740 as an infant, must, I think, be
taken together to mean that he was born about 1738, which fits
with information.we have about his brother James and sister
?'
Penelope, both of whom it seems, must have been born in America.
0
---
This folio.also reports that I was unable to find an Obituary
�-..
Notice for him in "The Gentleman's Magazine".
Fo.
Mc.11 - I had a look for a Will of Henry Eustace's widow, Udall, but
(
did not find any out to 1838. But, of course, we have no idea
how old Udall was. If she was a young woman when enry Eustace
Z
0
married her in 1?90, she could have survived unti something
like 1845/50 perhaps, though this seems a bit unlikely. How -
;`n
`
ever, more research will be needed to find her.
Fo.
Mc.12 - As promised in mine of 31st October last, I called up the original
A
& B Will of Henry Eustace and a•photocopy of it is at this folio
�
number Mc. 12/A. This is interesting on several counts
among which are, first of course, it contains his signature
cJ
-C)
and, secondly, it was sealed with an Armorial Seal. This was
Davie County t .. .,,, uiy
Mocksvillc NO
U
Y
- 2 -
Mrs. Alice H. Eidson.
rather damaged and I could not decipher all of it but a sketch
of what I could make out is attached. The Heraldic Charge is
"a Fret Engrailled", the Crest appeared to be "An Arm Throwing
an Arrow" and part of the Motto read "...... Animo". Comparison
of these blazoned details with those recorded in "Burkes General
Armory" for McCULLOCH (see photocopy of Burke, page 637 herewith),
showed that, whilst the Arms of the Seal do not match exactly
with any of those given in Burke, they are very -similar. The
noteworthy point being that all the Burke Arms are associated
with McCULLOCHs of Scotland and does appear to strengthen Henry
Eustace's connection through his father, with the James of
Grogan in Ireland, who, according to the IREDELL Memoirs, was
a descendant of some Scottish McCULLOCHs. However, whilst this
is all "good stuff" and interesting, I do not think it helps us
" directly at this time, but we should keep it in mind.
Fo. Mc.14 - I then tried to find Henry Eustace3s letter of July, 1803,
mentioned in your State Archives reference to PRO -T.79/115. I
examined first, PRO references A012,/34, A012/117 and A012/109,
all of which referred to original records regarding Henry Eustace's
dealings with the American Loyalist Claims Commission in London,
circa 1783. At the folio mentioned in the margin, I give details
of those of my findings which I felt were of most interest to you.
I did photocopy pages 224 to 232 of A012/334 but this is bulky
and I do not think it is worth the cost of mailing it to you at
this stage. I did not find Henry Eustace's Diploma amongst the
papers, nor any document giving details of his place and date of
birth and education in England.
Fo. Mc -15 - A search was made in PRO -T.79/115 and amongst the photocopies of
letters in that file of Office Copies of Letters of 1803, was the
one from Henry Eustace to Mr. Hay of the American Loyalist
Claims Commission, dated 1st July;. 1803 (Mc. 15/2), saying he was
enclosing his Diplima "from which will appear my birth and educa-
tion in England". I have again checked with the Librarian at
Middle Temple but they repeat that they have no information about
Henry Eustace other than that given in their letter of 22nd July,
1981 (Fo. Mc/3). I must confess that, even if they had had a
copy of Henry Eustace's Diploma, I would not have thought that
it would, itself, have recorded the information he said and which
we seek. I think it might be worth a further search in PRO/AO13/117
and I will do this after my return here at the end of March,
if you wish.
So, in spite of quite a lot more effort,
find a statement about Henry Eustace's "birth and
However, at this stage, I think we should avoid mo
we have not been able to
education in England".
re than modest expenditure
pavks
-3-
Mrs. Alice H. Eidson.
on the background of Henry Eustace and his father. I believe, as I mentioned
in mine of 19th August, 1981, that the principal object of your attention should
be James MCCULLOH, whose Will, dated June, 1814, was proved in 1816 in Rowan
County. Do you know his age at death and where he is buried? If not, can
you discover? His age at death would enable us to form a fairly accurate estimate
of his date of birth and this would help identification.
As I understand it, you do not know, at this time, whether that
James was born in America or was an immigrant. Do you know whether his
e"N marriage took place in America? I presume you have not, so far, managed
to discover this.
Did you manage to date the "Life and Correspondence of James IREDELL"?
The reason why I ask is because those Memoirs mentioned on page 5, a James
McCULLOH (son of William) "now of Camday near Dundalk in Ireland.... who is
yet a bachelor". Looking at a sketch pedigree of MCCULLO(C)H I comiled from
those Memoirs, I wondered if the James who died in Rowan County in 1916 was
the James of Camdey. The date of "now of*Camdey" and "yet a bachelor" would
help to prove or disprove that idea.
An account for the researches dealt with in this letter is enclosed.
I will not do anything more until I have your observations and fresh direc-
tions. With best wishes for 1982,
Yours sincerely,
W. J. F. Fenton.
Davie County Public.:+
Mocks -41e, NC
Reel # Z-5-14614 / Microfilm T79/9
To the Honorable the Commifsioners appointed
by Act of Parliament under the Convention with the U. S. of
America
Gentlemen:
I trust that the peculiar hardship and cruelty of my
situation will be considered by you as a sufficient Excuse
for my troubling you with the following statement.
My husband Henry Eustace McCulloh, Esq. some Years ago
delivered to your Board the particulars of his claim under the
Statue by which you were appointed Commifsioners and I have
•,
been given to understand that altho the Justice of such claim
was generally admitted, yet some proofs were required on his
part before it was actually allowed.
Mr. McCulloh conscious that he should ultimately succeed
in procuring the proof required and anxious to continue in
that respectable situation he had hitherto maintained in life
invested the Fortune that remained to him almost wholly in
the purchase of Short Annuities and exerted himself to the
utmost'for many years in endeavoring to procure the evidence
you required but unfortunately without succefs. That the
Short Annuities expiring last Year or the beginning of the
present, Mr. McCulloh was to the utmost Distrefs, which
.had so powerful an Effect on his Mind, as to•render it
necefsary to remove him, under the care of Dr. Munro, to
Brooks House Clapton, a House licensed for the Reception of
4
Lunaticks, where he still continues, in a most Deplorable
State both of Mind and Body.
�--
Since Mr. McCulloh' s confinement I have beon under the
�•
necefsity of selling his House in Lincolns Inn Fields with the
•d
Furniture and Effects there. I am now so reduced in
circumstances as to have scarcely sufficient for the support
of Mr. McCiii jo l and myself, altho till now we have been
,.
accustomed to maintain a respectable appearance and
situatioi:L in Life.
r-
County Public Library
v
-
Davie
Mooksdie, ISG
Reel if Z-5-14614 ' Microfilm T79/9
To the Honorable the Commifsioners appointed
by Act of Parliament under the Convention with the'U. S. of
America
Gentlemen:
I trust that the peculiar hardship and cruelty of my
situation will be considered by you as a sufficient Excuse
for my troubling you with the following statement.
My husband Henry Eustace McCulloh, Esq. some Years ago
delivered to your Board the particulars of his claim under the
Statue by which you were appointed Commifsioners and I have
been given to understand that altho the Justice of such claim
was generally admitted, yet some proofs were required on his
part before it was actually allowed.
Mr. McCulloh conscious that he should ultimately succeed
in procuring the proof required and anxious to continue in
that respectable situation he had hitherto maintained in life
invested the Fortune that remained to him almost wholly in
the purchase of Short Annuities and exerted himself to the
utmost'for many years in endeavoring to procure the evidence
you required but unfortunately without succefs. That the
Short Annuities expiring last Year or the beginning of the
present, Mr. McCulloh was to the utmost Distrefs, which
had so powerful an Effect on his Mind, as to render it
necefsary to remove him, under the care of Dr. Munro, to
Brooks House Clapton, a House licensed for the Reception of
Lunaticks, where he still continues, in a most Deplorable
State both of Mind and Body.
Since Mr. McCulloh's confinement I have been under the
c� necefsity of selling his House in Lincolns Inn Fields with the
Furniture and Effects there. I am now so reduced in
circumstances as to have scarcely sufficient for the support
oof Mr. McCulloh and myself, altho till now ive have been
accustomed to maintain a respectable appearance and
situatiotL in 1 ife.
•o U a••
V
{'w\Jaiie county Public UbrarY
T
MO&S'ale, NC
s
Under these very distrefsing circumstances I ntinued to
n,
address you and most humbly intreat that you will be pleased
to extend your Bounty to me by taking Mr. McCulloh's claim
into your early consideration and to make an Order for the
immediate payment of a part of what I have understood and
believed to be justly and fairly his due.
Gentlemen, with respect
Your most obed humble servant
Udell McCulloh
• N. 15 Percy Street
12 September 1807
Davi'9 County Public Ubra
ty
Mocksvirle, NC
9
M4,11
McCULLOH - Search for a Will of Udell/Udall NbCULLOH
widow of Henry Eustace McCULLOH.
PRO - 6th November 1981
We have no clue to her age nor to the date and place of her death.
Search was therefore made in the Death Duties registers at the PRO;
their reference IR27. These were searched over the period 1813
to 1838. The only reference to McCULLOH in that time was:
1816 Francis McCULLOH - Extrix Eleanor McCULLOH of
Gt. Ormond St. .;Will proved PCC -
IR26 Ref: 2/284.
r�
pubft our�1 C�c �
�y� � cksviile� N�
�Ao
W. J. F. FENTON
82, H ERSHAM ROAD,
WALTON-ON-THAM ES
SURREY, KT12 5NU.
W.4
McCULLOH - Some searches at the P.R.O., Kew, into the American
Loyalist Claims Commission.
2nd December, 1981 - P.R.O. Reference: A.0.12/34, pages 215.and 228, etc.
P. 215 -
'"o the Commissioners appointed by the Act of Parliament for Enquiring in' --o
the losses and services of the American Loyalists.
Is
The Memorial of Henry Eustace McCULLOH.,Esquire late of North Carolina,
"Sh*weth that your Memorialist is a Barrister -at -Law and was for several
years an inhabitant and a member of H.M. Honourable Council of Collectors
of Newborn and Edenton in North Carolina and afterwards Agent for the sal d
Province and that he has been throughout life uniformly ,oyal and attached
to the British Goverrar:ent .
That he resided in America upwards of thirteen years and was at New York
in 1778 where finding he could not be suffered to remain in North Carolina
but in the detested conditions of taking the oaths to the rebel Government
and becoming an active Agent against this country he determined, though
strongly invited to return, to leave his property in North Carolina to the
manifest hazard of destruction (the same having been conditionally confiscAted
in December, 1777) and to prefer his duty to God and to his lawful King
and Government and hit claim to the rights and to the protection promised
h-- ac a loyal subject above all other considerations........ t'
n
..... that he laid such his determination before their vvicellenries the Cor
r.and er-
in-Chief and the Royal Commissioners and was honoured with their war:: ap-
probation and that he in consequence left America with the Commissioners and
has taken refuge in England ever since and he humbly submits that such his
conduct was at that time of considerable weight and much attended to as he
was generally known to be a person of very large property and as having long
been in a public character and situation which gave him a right to be
acquainted with public matters......"
..... , that your Memorial ist's late father uenry :'-IcCTJLLOH , Esquire wac. en-
titled
n-
titled and possessed of near eight hundred thousand acres of land in :�orth
Carolina .subject to a condition of forfeiture as to all such parts thereof
as should not be settled within a limited period in the proportion of one
white person to every two hundred acres. That his late Majesty King George
II by his Royal Order in Council dated 13th October, 1?56 was pleased to
extend the term of the said settlement to the 25th March, 1760.11
Henry Eustace McCULLOH did not make the smallest claim to any part of his
father's said estate but that he held and claims part of the lands reserved
as aforesaid under Deeds from his father in his lifetime (confirmed to him by
his father's Will and by Articles of Agreement) etc.
.....respecting the nature and value of your Memorialist's lands he thinks
it absolutely necessary to entreat your attention to the following brief
particulars:- That they did not lie in great and extensive bodies but
consisted of several hundred distinct tracts or surveys interspersed in
eleven counties generally from two to three hundred acres in a survey and laid
p,avia County Public uu,acI�ccksvi�le, NC
out and fitted to the greatest advantage with wood, water and soil for
farms or plantations and ready for immediate occupancy. 0 .....etc.
q
....in 1761/2 and 7, the average price at which they sold (and then thought
:eery high) was from 1 to 2. and 3 shillings an acre. In less than 110' years
after he read- sold for 5 shillings to 10 and '!7 shil.:.ings the acre and
,:Ln average price at which he now estimated his ! an.d.s is about: or under Q
shillings sterling, an acre. 11
ar
.,,,,that in. the course of ten years prior to the rebellion; their property
.:: Carolina averaged them more than Z1,8m sterling a year, nett, in London.
That in 1778, from a total failure of remittances, they were necessitated
to apply to the Government for temporary relief and had fi-00 per year
ordered them.#
That your Memori ali st's father is now (lead and your Memorialist _s a'_lo::ed
w.,^0 a year irY:ich is al? :,upport and part payment of the interest of hi -c
deb is here :.phi ch exceed all his British property
....There then follows a reference to two -Schedules A and B, submitted with
the Claim and outlining the property involved and an assessment of its value.
This submission ends "Your Memorialist therefore humbly prays that he may
be .... etc, etc.
Signed Henry E. Mcl."I"UL10H.
Tiampton Wick, 5th November, 1783."
P . 228 -
On this page on which the evidence actually begins, there J-1- the following
statement: -
T1. e
tatement:-
TTe (Henry Eustace McCULLOH ) was a native of London, went to America ae an
infant in V40. From 1761-1767 was a member of the Council and an Office!-
of
fficerof the Crown. From 1767-1772, was in England. Went back to America again
in 1772 and returned to England in 17?3. Went back 'Co Ne% -r Fork in J:,ly , 17?8
and returned to England later in 1778.
7 also examined P.R.O. reference A.O. 13/117. This appeared to contain the
original papers connected with Henry Eustace McCTJLLO,H's efforts to support
his Claim and, inter alfa, contains a detailed list of lands lying in the
counties of Guildford, Anson and Rowan in North Carolina, the property of
Henry Eustace McCULLOH 'left for sale in the hands of Thomas Frohock Esquire,
his Attorney in fact, with the lowest prices affixed to each tract at which
he is empowered to dispose of the same - Rowan County, 2.0th May, 177;.
There were also, in this collection, some letters from one signing B. M.
McCULLOCTI (I think this must be Benjamin McCULLOCH - W.J.F.F.). These were
addressed to Henry Eustace as "Dear Cousin" and dated around 1784. I did
not discover any sign of the certificate of Henry Eustace McCULL01K'i8 birth
or baptism in London amongst these papers but it seems probable that this
would be found in P.R.O. reference T.79/115. These are Treasury papers and
are a collection'of correspondence and I am arranging to get them examined.
Davis County Public library
Mocksviile, NC
-3 -
I also examined P.R.O. reference A.O.
1?/109 - these are the proceedings of
the Commissioners of the American Claims under th-e Acts of 2.3rd, 125th, ?6th,
?7th, 28th and 29th, George III and contain the reports and statements by
the said Commissioners, the names of
the Claimants and the amount of the:..
Claims and the liquidation thereof.
The following appears under Certificate
No. 1133:
Name of Claimant:
H. E. McCULLCH.
Province:
North Carolina.
Claim for Loss of Property:
E 54,265
SLris Originally Allowed:
"Po 1810y)
Sum as Allowed on Revision:
No Er_ try
Percentage to be Deducted per Act of
Parliament:
Total Sum Payable under Act of
Parliament:
E 171?311. It. o.
Sum Already Received:
� 511411. 8. r).
Balance After Such Receipt:
g 1118?2. 16. O.
Deduction on Account of Pension:
?5•
Final Balance:
z 11,717. 16. ^•
which amount it would appear, was paid.
There were also references to a James McCULLOCH of South Carolina,
Certificate No. �i30, who claimed 91,8?7 anal got 2513. 11=. ^. (I am
doubtful if this McCULLOCH is anything to do with Henry rustace - W.J.F.F.).
W. J. F. FENTON
62, H ERSHAM ROAD,
`NAL.TON-ON-THAMES.
SURREY. KT12 5NU.
public Ubf *
DW+G Coun- NC
Click
McCulloh
Surname
Coady
Coady
Cody
Peacock
Ridenhour
Ridenhour
Ridenhour
Williams
Williams
Williams
Williams
Williams
Surname
Alexander
Bailey
,j Barnhardt
Barnhardt
Barnhardt
Barnhardt
152
Walter G.
Son of J. N. and M. E. Click
Aged 2 years, 3 months, 18 days
-
___ Aged 89 years, 8 months, 19 days
Henry Eustace -`
Drowned in Click spring after
overbalancing; too feeble to get up;
brother to Elisabeth Click, son of James
and Elizabeth McCulloh
No date given
June 23, 1806
May 18, 1860
Novembeg16JN6 - -
Angus[ 31, 1886
CODY/COADY FAMMY CEMETERY
Drive Highway /1601 South to Cherry Hill Road, tum left;
drive to Clyde Ridenhour property near Concord United Methodist Church.
Given Name
Birth Date
Death Date
John
No date given
Apri127, 1857
Husband of Leah Cody
February 20, 1885
March 26, 1919
Nancy Jane
February 6, 1831
October 12, 1874
Infant
No date given
July 6, 1847
Son of John and Leah Cody
December 14, 1857
October 17, 1915
Alice
February 1, 1876
December 29, 1922
Wife of W. M. Peacock
August 8, 1909
February 6, 1925
Barbara Jane
April 29, 1862
October 20, 1917
Wife of J. C. Ridenhour
John C.
No date given
November 13, 1946
Aged 77 years
February 27, 1875
April 18, 1943
John G.
June 17, 1891
July 14, 1907
Son of J. C. Ridenhour
Ernest
March 12, 1899
April 13, 1928
G. F.
October 20, 1859
September 3, 1911
J. O.
September 28, 1854
January 18, 1913
Mary
September 4, 1851
July 3, 1925
Wife of J. O. Williams
Willie Franklin
1890
May 10, 1907
CONCORD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH CEMETERY
From Mocksville, travel Highway 601 south four miles to Deadmon Road;
tum left, go to Highway 801 south; tum right and cemetery is on
the left.
Given Name
Birth Date
Death Date
Mira
February 20, 1885
March 26, 1919
Wife of J. Alexander
Carl Jeffrey
June 15, 1957
January 5, 1975
Amanda M.
December 14, 1857
October 17, 1915
Wife of W. L. Barnhardt
Annie Elizabeth
August 8, 1909
February 6, 1925
Daughter of C. F. and Margaret
Barnhardt
Baxter Paul
August 22, 1916
November 1, 1989
Columbus F.
February 27, 1875
April 18, 1943
H
W. J. F. FENTON
GENEALOGIST
Member of the Association of Genealogists and Record Agents
82 HERSHAM ROAD
WALTON-ON-THAMES
SURREY KT12 5NU
ENGLAND
Tel.: Walton -on -Thames 25214
Mrs Alice H. Eidson,
1135, Kenvood Street,
Winston-Salem, N.C.
U.S.A. 27103
Dear Mrs. Eidson,
Saturday, 31st October 1981
Davie County Public Library
Mocksville, NC
Thank you for your letter of 2nd September with its
enclosures.
I write to say that agter rather a long haul I have found the
Will of Henry Eustace McCULLOH. It is dated 1st Nov. 1803 and
was proved at London in April 1812 by Udell McCULLOH his widow and
relict. An abstract, including an abstract also df the Estate
Duty records, is enclosed, You will no doubt be much interested
in all this (as I was), not least by the reference in the first
Codicil to the €600,000 compensation paid by the U.S.A. and in which
H.E. McC,hoped to share. It looks as though he had not received
any of it by the time he died as the Estate Duty records show that
his effects were 'Sworn under 23,500'.
In the light of the second codicil we do not know where
Hbnry Eustace was buried. Looks as though it might well be St. John
at Hackney, in which parish I think itA s that Clapton, Middx lies.
However, his Memorial Inscription, if any , could be informative and
I will try to find it. Udell might also be buried in the same grave.
I have called up the original of Henry Eustace's Will as I
feel sure you would like to have a photo -copy of it. I will order one
and let you have it when it comes to hand - this may take about 6 weeks.
The�yill and Codicils are quite short and so the copy should not be too
expensive.
Now, of course, this disposes of two earlier questions:
(a) Udall or Udell WEST - She was evidently Henry Eustace's wife and
they were married in 1790.
..... / (b)
,P
AO
2-
(b) Extraction of Duplin County Minutes
of April 1786 referring to
Henry Eustace as dee d
If correctly extracted I
think this must imply
confusion in the original
document between Henry Eustace
and his father. As we know,
Hnfery Eustace was his father's
agent in America.
(c) Henry Eustace's Will does not mention any children of his. We
do not know how old Udell was when he married her. Her Will
might resolve this question of whether they had any children.
With referencetA para 2 of your letter of 2nd Sept. and the
question of the slaves,the extract of the
�uplin County Court records for
January 1790 refers to slaves being divided between Penelope, Catherine
and Henry children of James McCULLOH. I agree that our information 14
that Henry Eustace, son of James and Elizabeth was not born till 1806,
but they had a daughter Henrietta; could your searcher who abstracted
the Court records have read an abbreviation of Henrietta as Henry? If
so this would bring things back into line. For my part I incline
to the view that the James who died in Rowan Countyin 1816 and whom I
estimate was born (in America?) about 1750 is the James referred to
in Henry's Will of 1779. Our problem is that that Will does not define
what relationship (if any) that James was to him (Henry McCULLOH).
I think the answer (if there is one to be found) probably lies in
America.
Apart from looking for a record of Henry Eustace's burial and
possible memorial and for a Will of Udall/Udell McCULLOH I will not
do anything more at this end until I hear from you.
I enclose an accoubt to cover the work referred to in this
letter and will let you have the photo -copy of Henry Eusatce's Will
when I get it.
With all best wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Davi County Public IaVarY
mocks me, NC.
W. J. F. FENTON
GENEALOGIST
Member of the Association of Genealogists and Record Agents
82 HERSHAM ROAD
WALTON-ON-THAMES
SURREY KT12 SNU
ENGLAND
Tel.: Walton -on -Thames 25214
Thursday, 21st February 1980
Mrs Alice H. Eidson,
1135, Kenwood Street,
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27103
U.S.A.
Dear Mrs. Eidson,
Your letter addressed to the Secretary of the AGRA has been
referred to me.
I can do the work you want but before be;inning I think I
should let you know about costs so that you can consider the
position form that standpoint and also seek some additionsl
information as you may be able to provide from' -the American end.
My current fees are 2,3.50 per hour and necessary disbursements,
that is such charges as I have to pay in order to get access to
records, get ce_-tified or other copies and so forth, together
with a share.of travelling costs as appropriate. My'usual method of
working is to invite an initial funding dependei_t upon the nabuse of
the research:�s required, to make initial researches within or close to
that funding and to make a report together with recommendations
for continuance of the work as seems appropriate in the light of
the findings. This enables you to keep in touch with the work
and to control expenditure as may be required.
If this suits you I suggest you let me have an initial funding
of L30 or so and I will then proceed as outlined above.
In order to save delays involved in exchane of correspondence
I will pmt my enquiries for additional information to you now.
(a) Can you provide me with a family tree covering 2 ;generations of
descent from Nathaniel HOULTON of Pennsylvania as described in your
letter, i.e. details of Nathaniel HOULTON and his wife (she with the
6 children) and their own children? and such as is known about their
marria es and children, viz Nathaniel's grandchildren?
- 2 -
(b) Do you know:
(1) The widow's original maiden name?, and
(2) Her married name when she was widowed and married NAthaniel?
I keep pretty busy so if .you do wish me to work for you,I would
be grateful if you would let me know without much delay.
I shall look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely,
WJF�i7yton...........
1.135 Kenwood Street
Winston-Salem, N. C., 27103
March 23, 1980
Mr. W. J. F. Fenton
83 Hersham Road
Walton -On -Thames
Surrey KT12 5NU
England
Dear Mr. Fenton,
Please excuse my not answering your letter of February 21 sooner.
In the future I promise to be prompt. My step -daughter died
suddenly of a heart attack the first of Marcl• and I put aside my
genealogical records and work for a period. She was far too
young to die of a heart attack and I was quite upset about the
whole thing.
I am happy that you are going to undertake finding my ancestors.
My initial check for $75.00 is enclosed.
I will enclose what I know about Nathaniel Houlton. Family
tradition has always been that we came from England but on my own
I have not been able tv come up with a clue as to where. For
ages I worked on the.assumption that he came from the Wiltshire
Houltons (Holtons). Their families had a lot of Nathaniels and
a lot of Johns but I couldn't get them to fit, hence no attempt
at documentation. I read Mr. Boucher's history of the Houltons
carried in the Wiltshire Notes and Queries which a friend obtained
for me from our National Archives, but I couldn't get them to
match. I was so excited when I found christening at All Hallows
The Great on Bread Street. The dates seemed to fit. Alas, when
I read further they turned out to be the Houltons in Wiltshire.
(A Houlton in Wiltshire left money to that church and when I
checked the dates of birth on their pedigree sheet, they were the
same - so I was back where I started from.
At Nathaniel Houlton's marriage to Martha Miller Jordan, John
Houlton attended - though he was not a Quaker. I believe he was
Nathaniel's brother. Three Houltons lived in Chester County,
Pennsylvania at one time but I don't think the other - Francis
Holton - was a brother.
I shall look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely, '
W. J. F. FENTON
82, H ERSHAM ROAD,
WALTON-ON-THAMES
SURREY, KT12 5NU.
In account with Mrs. Alice H. Eidson,
Account accompanying letter of 3rd Fehrugry 1982
To:
Searches in Parish Register of St. John -at -Hackney
Searches for':.Wills and copies of Will of
Henry Eustace McCULLOH
Searches in American Loyglists Claims Commission
Records at the PRO, Kew
Miscellaneous other searches, copies, etc
Review, analysis, report .,and
Postage
rz 4.00
12.25
21.69
3.00
9.50
1.80
52.24
Davis County Public Ubratj .
Mooksville, NC
ei• .Are k �.
�, /=5•�.if/� i.�..✓ 2rc%. f7<� CLers/ <G/+� �.0'r.a. CV<��'�'�
t��»�' a.i x �� � /i.�r: Gr.-�y Cc� a�„p.G.✓• a...c. �.,,-��--��</l�_�•r���r�.,.G: Cd'v*7`'`' ' .
<�. � /re(I' "✓uw.% r Q,sJ � �� � � ry- fGf✓1 ' �9i.N'r-i. a .,t-..� 'n
l«.[` •lh„ti,.�.W �G,x..:'y - .
-
'-'"3"�y� .d � ,rrtiyfi2f� G.✓ .. //L'wSUC /^''1//JJ•?iKtl�. p�r/. jr/ q p� �i.. .t .Cc .c.G - �(�C CY•.
�� C� L/a<w c[' 4�G.p«� _ ILwI; ' aA/ J tisw// , YJ...l � • aG 0. QYid/. 02 /i. !(..P/tfo �;
?„ /:.:pct /zsin/' �Iv /� .:o7.r.('" ""Y`• [.,r �lw . � s<.rd /h�.r[s�i , '�/. c./J 2 d�j�'-
,(�O'� .«((jjl. �.f... (D[M srsiw'�l( • `�k«a'et:' slr+�i✓' J%�«' /',un•� r(r..�✓ 'f-Q�l aj. �S.t 1641% .. ,i-.
let,„ AG f: � Y!w °/x4f�� �jVf..u2t"H. C/'
11� ..J ..Cr./ [tA�U �/lr.n y; .' `{n l�v i��.lw•n _/Y//2 GL C ¢Gv/'r— (/<i
���G/GSL•' Q/l.,/L'zr'yyC[d/::. �G t,♦a �4� /anl�% .(... Q� a,.» .,,... n, /// • Cj� .r4 a✓c (in+/ SLI
I J r / uJ ,., ell
Hln /,i ,. l' n O �n/)i (Iv[.rrr, . L: /.. :." •1/ i. /!r !/ /• ///rr n � !-r/�afn !%/• '� � .
ii I'. 1.rrnr 'rIi rhe n,i. ;;i../, el
t/ol�r�[•
.f.<r ../ �G,%'d •ftw.[ <.,,�.f.� /l� `,N. .....t .�". `f•<i;;..,/ fh.,.��ll(. F' lu.
�/Lw r[ f[.� -n✓ ![.//+Jr Bw I( rC/ ltl. ✓.,....,. is<i lv x.% /r a..(/ [!�w.ra-/ �A/r /.tntt.
�firyw�[/JI n.I 'd at+t r� .'1J.t/C ,<':aU A..k/p .�i.J l,••.., J: a.a .�' n.� n, p%r., •.r:•/ Cln/
•J �Nl".(•it.r/ .-���'�n<I CC O -!n'' .Ci L� ,lw.�/ fAi L..n. Il �� /. •t r.,, nr✓ .r/�rCw. C.+i.ww.//,
Ir,/� "[nf/, /L{{t/<Dpp /i `` n.•nr ,_... ,: r/, :...1 rJ<�/, r�l'n•r (: '.. (r.. J. "Gum .✓�/r r.;.r (,
!Qw,l ,:, a-..✓' t'L../ ..l..,.. (/h.' ,Ja..[ cir.w. f i/:rct J"l r"`C `r (/r /, .f (([f:' !./ ✓.<1/.[, rllrrr...
-ell/.zx.(.(.�t Rr�• an/r
�F•�// �_mmfiaLl .l.K. <Jux lldd�� /si rr r -sr (.f /r(.( 2J/+/(
<//c?nt' ..lc, a, ,.l :.f,.. � ..,. a(( f}r• /'IN!! !-J R n Al:.! C!x!'((;
(.�-ri.I GG<ss fk..I . � rf .' /.r✓/ }�a-.r✓J _-'� ` f!'<. /! : ->iA ' /L[<A .7.r....vw ,/a/"n o(' � ➢../(y O�/11%:
/Jx .l 99e«i/ �r<+-.I ./......(/2�/i.I /1. n -A a.(� 11.9. l•( .1..«li-CIf �¢'¢-r/.li'-//!JC/�':e
(y' i� (.0 �4A�i•!.1.✓ !X/11. f��.l�f-/ O� .�l��'�[?
,,✓/,<.,i.•.i
Z(/ G�([+c <�sAz,'�t'J ?y( /llilp/au.,� of e�nr/ln-wn �f)�4•/s/o!4.1
�LrLf,• `/�.! .//.t�.lft'j a?n.d - �.4/ �ii(C iks...n.,Cs.' �,/. f�/sr+�•./� A.si,[/ !-v+� /(.�,1�}
*-. �4•ry a."Gi(.." tn' � /h•.. .c/ ✓LiT .�ts+,�,,-:.'�Yw C�cu• + a� <
Q.+i' (Yeu�i�',. G..2 d• �-D:<�i++-j�` `f� /L.r A( �H�.� C[.CJO � �� .0�."'%r1
/�,
., � _"7'21." Lkr. lla.�...N.! % /""'"' r (L� of<. an..,y t.,.4�t/�... ._:�/�✓✓/�..✓Itp.W,v' /h'�r�"1
:t
ih��Ai ,[:zls G�LL(++� C/-clrld"e!/' �✓l.'K(lie!! o --t/. GvLLv ,Fr) ffu/d /ir%fl� (J(,a/�j e!
'#H.. �/�/Af / �[""9 QpA //(O �(�. ��!',,.r t[.1/r.��v...•��.rrC ,��/� Y♦ i�/(%�et.irx.� (/C,(.'I�'tr"^�:j
/,/-/V/i%/ !i/J ,,'lurnl <Gl.. .D(fr <C. [,/- Af/fr.+,./ (/'N f-i0i/.1L.<!✓ ,: -:'!j .Iri+c+9 GLn% (f���
LE:
�1�5 _ X.' QAw•�•+.� (�ArttnuG A� .�ir-M li nll (1 �.,<"n. �� I <...' C,/f. ,9ffr- X• xf
/}!Y`-�NU�-i'=, �,...../�u•. - '„vn'`< e- ✓ LLn ne <w,e l�s..el-r s�/aeTwyia ^/�,r.
2
�.^l<-'L:%rj Prn.✓ �Llr !J� /2/Ra 1m0. t�-0r�-r / �/ar ( ��. ;/�tr� -/ (�r /�.�r' C!>r r�r
rtoo
i ✓� .✓nr:.( r! r,.l r,c(.. 0, .r... / �; f/` I dnuJ .�f�
i$1/'a • ,r ,/ n . !.•I /i .r it rJr,/ ,
/.✓ ! h /, rl yr 1 //-rw !Y /L �, .f�..sa (C%!! r.hls.r• .. /� •✓ �•.r... r /l. •.. �1t1 i4
✓R n� �.✓ .(t.aw/ /.•. r' f•lre.(� C rrn. r ��
r
C/.. �rr;r (f /(r M.. /LGt ✓.!.✓/Fr�tr F✓Crrn✓ ,fri..rn % ... �� ... ._, I �/� ..'1
�" 17, /jL�-�� 9G�000P oil
�, }
% ,
✓1'.:�'iR/brit/ �1(J Mer!(
/ p
D
"!iron N,..✓ a<a%'/.p .., i / ! r � r
r r �
/41
/(,rr /LUrr. r %. / n xe✓ r9rr,; (ri / G..r iaL�3
.' l�iJ 1 /rrt .. i... ! fp/; fr. �rq rF26✓C-/<r G.:rr !s•. ,' U ;
r.P
! i
c l9 l%
y / /
QJ.%2/i✓I(.`J�/�%'l���t��.y��� �1't.'l/�C/- ���'C.P/ Cfe'C'0n'n/ c.
,g F/,/x� l'/ /%i,of �� �l/•,J �/nf�a.✓ (.C./!� �la�/ .��i�/.arr.t�Jti/.
/+ (;e'
rd
�6 /'�/r',
l J/ (- f 032 • lf// �d tc<�iN
c I • /G J ` l [ r�? �f � �J�' N brl �(_ � C! // ✓i/v/e!,>/ �GLrn.�ti ..G/ lynq✓ lCiw.r �.t
_ !� P-oa J !<r%!r[ eC/ ✓i L 1./Jr[!.0 M. �; , Y / jl. r �b[�� Gr,� ('�/ CY �7/f4'�
l !L't�.r. � srr�i ' r''�in! �� Q aLrr� f., ✓'
!/tcra %r �`rc•N/ Fr✓'(.r rP. (' v'Cn,rl(a. C✓ 'r! 2or aC l./v-[a-.<te oler Xln✓-n rt,Jb«,
u. - (p ,
[ O i
! l9izr(. (�V ([.PrT.I�). �%%9r'/lie(,!( u.,l,/ (a tca..w ,l�J-a/� •.
/ /. '� til �r !`•rta1«.L..e e°Ill ,/ s(r-ti✓V �c// �!r t:./jr(Jr.,.,''
rl
Q rr..+-«.. r /4 ' °..,.,,� r✓Y C�7r r (i{er✓/rY u''- Jl'2
d
/' 9 ', r ' r r r
r r Q^.) �✓hdrJl ri/,,Y /v'.re/ri rflr ^r' Of owl; l
, •/ (�[,r�r-.✓ (/lfr r.✓� �l(/tG�l.d Irr
---- --. �_._. I ...�;.i. � �. � s 'd..i-t .4.+.�;.1isw.iM :'y..•••t. r.....�:�" ,'....::J',• y.;..;.r....�_;!:.�'.+<.:�'.i�:��'�2�r i, €. ,i`• -i� . .. 'X's'++rii�+iwi�%'t'•f� .
w�lle, NC
Z71
//
LC�/e [P
/
ltr+ry/ /�1r..1.•.t�. f r/CI-eh �, ro.I.
:�
jc f� •1'lF.•i t t .' Cl t{ C� l'•�lr.y rr, tr/�'r•'t� %f ,t✓f �-fut, Pa('il�,C.
4 (P%(tC•� 14,
4d ,t?,! Clsu(. �Ji►z!�.,r.[. ' L[;!r/Ii.�ta� iL�%!t-7�./.,,
r ;Gl � �?/lt;�` �Jt/N� ' V,/✓ 'tLlro.,=f.��r✓. �l �Lj/.1;•,✓ C'/ilJ`1[-1,, ,t%I�GJ. SNA
.-r.Mrt1 (o-t�ru✓� �(
l.r
ll.
(�' ,r. •`tri n'� s� �l tt/ %(«,r.� (t'-h r Mt<'
zi�cr� iLi td�Crf, or' t,.r
L�A p
, �.d ' �zt� : .: c reI rE� �,. ✓ ✓f%a�i . 'y
/tus (.1�7(-�st� Z ct-il tl' �CNEcr i12•f4 Qli✓ t,P/ : �JOc1'Gf+' �(! l�l�d� t /v ���C!/
N .r,% ten' t�� �Lt idr!>rra�t e�Yt r/. �.,✓ .. G ..:,�t.ld `L1 �+�� �=� JF
!�
•' ! • • n ss r. `GO .!!tf .�Cu R'�i/. C�6lsrV / . ��; .
.. - t�C •1 tr,✓ �i1, ' (C,t�/•/l� `t/�.r%1-•r,�' r �(.ltlt+ c[I• �ir'lfr•T/ M vFt'�' ,piLf <!.. �-1✓' r "�" ,vij %'lce �tti t(/!F !t`tf,..,�
!00,
C
VGA � Cl/ u••►/ �.�rn-,,,- rL0 �l�k•✓ �.lU�.i,��j,,sfn.iin- ..:/i` �1/.; G� C.- CI�t� -1 Ro1r l �•J � .
.,
/j/y4 ..I �� • r j �: ar/ a.% fil%tL� /1/� l.�'1 �7r
ell, Lf K. ..(_ (lst/ , tr. rl�' .' �ll./M�% r•%'I�H..- �••�u .-�/�S i^ I
t. 10a.i •!,
rr,(n�
e.ur �Cf .(.rfsca� Y/.` t'j�GfuJ rrr4GLJ Cr'>A�r..�.
'tt�/�xct,,.�r/i ,Lt jjr,Gt/lrCt ,L•�' �1�� GT�/,1 tt/dr��lri /t c.f�
{ %(.t X-?4t.' �/i f%tL•/ ' f?�/ %ll2t f ,ir re;. �,r'+ J I.� j -04.441
M �%
.•7tit./ ritl�� r.< ,t rt�l�t.✓� f,! ' :(���„1/t+� ,diztJ r"ZO��vN
!f
! �rr r•! l�.lite ..rt.!/ r'C l s,� t'f'r r t ( tl. r� is lr,+/ J/!-rr t Ji • L` •lav r.. - l.i+n� is^. -i .t. �c:•� C�A ! / ! r s 3
�`
.7
4l' d
,rn�, ,
�• � k�% ,/ /.t+.t'�!"(L'1 r1 !.� � /+' �l�i'� it%�t.LG( it. 1Z:' a:Ll,�� . : ; t-rt•r C, •' �� �L'f-ri1t�. / 1. !-1 r,.L� � (!r!r G�r• • ,.1, r�
7� t'�•r-its w e• f."� le.1 9f�u iAr'r>, fr .,
r nor �rir,r,2. rl.o /lv!/t. G�� G r.t/. �� •a6tl' '!G� .1�..fJ, /jZ/LtG7i_4�!/+• /' �'I-f'7 i✓r� c t !
j ' ,,, �ltfrrC. l{- ,•lt �.r,ti% /• 1,,. / .:C'.. �/%+^r .vitro!' ll' tlr+ Cliff/d C!/ Y�l��r�i 1.r1-•r!�l-�-r�►� .✓!J�`C�G>if ,C-o� ✓.�r�a'i � •/tr'
CGGzrf. /p .r"rc"G /r
f tri � ..�(_ ; �t-r�.r•' �`a.cl. �r rr. � C lC.p; r /� � �?-P-i,/�,r •V� ' Baa: <.� lift � t i�-�f-r':c� ��j� �t� ;�;
{ / /�, ! / l ' 1.^/ ./ r•' r.r 'j-.-.•,ti !� /t�(��� r n. /r is :r r'
r / (c ! f �l
fi� 6"•Jfi C • (/t !•r(.i r t l . ,tri' (/ � v � ✓r./.-9-t d.1
%:'�.rr, rt.•r:
3 f � ((� �' (,!{. �%"l� ,�> � !'�� / s% � >,' •'(`- ^%/ ,� •-, :C-lf•!!, . Ct1 .�Crf' '%r t/ �T.-t�! .'••� Cil r+J 7�^.'/s,e �„ t.•
stat G(i�l; l'(% lrJ/.: r ."ir :: ,•r � 1;' �1f(- Gr��a/!/,r!iht1 c?J� C'�?7lC'G6/zr_ �y !//,!�l� //41�� /tir
�`' `� r• I �r r �� '! l t!1 �'r ^'J� �/ C."/iI� '(. /H! c-tc-.� C.lr7 (.1J il
}e,� �i.. � �-ft C!..�i./.. /n ,, �/� %r-t it •/,'� />) eff l'/1;'1 t�_�,!_i1�'J,t.: tir: • ��l-�••!"r�"i.-, 'alit-fl �'rZIL�'r ijst.� /L 11: I':' .{
• �' � �• � . � �.,.lt ��'� /.r+ (r �r it• C/ : t r-i. , `/',^I'._�jr t•�.i.�'C..r� !.lilt o'� .��7..GB%!-?;/ o.�. L•(.��11 . �e �l:td ,!% G!. f_
.vG-�# .Lp /1� ! -.s "-,.,-i?", �. iyd,%l t<�tr .rJ`r . ra'/ /O!t
Yt.lrt
4rZ
!/ ' :lc _ ���ti rt .•� /�'t� �C�� r.Lsr'!-r' . /ftir(C Gfr (i .411'ri' Cs+':•t 1
t _ .a ` t . 11 / .Sl1;!' i.;. '��i•� %• ��r��l•% �•V', \�//!/.,.�Lli! �- FN,+M,G�Uv -tr, ,1 ,�f•G(A.E/i. i `�� / ' ^_�(.,'4Ia b•:�'
.l td l t �•N
i r►-3 .J .�',+ z1 �fq, tyt t t li! Q'c� evle 1 Ct N �(; .7 . �,% s�/4 `�/�-l`7yL�n { (I! �U!/• Gtis'yi{ l! ,�f+J
' •: ; %/�! /• ! •.� 1 C ' •t ' *: `� ��C��,Nll :.. .%"f= ' :! ..L� . [7 �rI' 'r..• (:�:1• t f%; : `r
=.; =r':,�•'%Z•,r'� •C.i/} :.Iti�'r�,/ %•r�I ,!l!•ft'a,_. rl,�?L(.�:;.. �'%!����!,.1�/� •.f �° .• / TT
A/.^
�::. r_
� '.f iii �`., � 1,' 'i .�% �•+,;� / '' ;t lxr:.. '•�$� ` � .t:. i�. i /�/ s / + .�r.
41N
r' �• '. / '� ` /` � :•6 / ••r �iG '7 j�:�!•✓L!'!{ � ,t•Yljs-7'/I .l r�(�'1�<:� j
1�, ,� ii., #,,�>t•r}T%^ r�y�.. r/11f1. �t.l, j-�:/+i'tt:/ y. Y34lJ�' icy ; �� p rt�{��1 /lfrr„K6
f+�s ** ., i'r ,; � .j /r� � / ,•\ �'- .� ..♦ -+. . J-• .Ir I/,' .'/ ,�.1.l'trY �:���� k � -,. .: �'!'�• cf 't. '�• /' � ,/ , t
.,.-. .w �:. c '•: i.� : .u. , y - A .,�,• / 1. •f; � t' _.ry Yi .�1���.' a//tet ,•:^ �_7 ,[t�i.�f! I, .r rr .,�',/yy� r. ��r c►
,���,t' , ti. , f//t'?•�(�(%/,�•�-• r .t ,kKyJYIDy f .) ,y� i I iT r'�L,,�t�h .•. f�i�/Z;- ''�'" Jt.�W� ? /'��/� f.Vr�/!NI� _ �L'1 - •r
,.v{ t.- nL lti•.t• l-1 il,.��r lY l•"s- ry �'��•; �,i,rr: �`.n'N.7g`'.:nfi(�t: :��c:t.�+.,y, j1Q�• K' Mt��..dy .r.. ars ..It !�;7.:1•;�• 't-•` ..• !I �ti:r� ,i�!l� /. '• ..r
+� •�`Si j r�•�;t;�i;'�� Y iif,:�•txi'v f�q�tjP /��.1: .,9fk' a •.��� � ,,�r•r 4kti �ti, µ.'� w n ..: ur''�(�� ! ,1 r , ���',
• �' ., �'+ R • �. ��j• �.,. �j�S ry, 'S?l� ,�', �' �.i � ,� �j•+ -.�.', J{c+, �•S. 1; . i,�'w 4� S j''f ' �•'� Y •�'�' �itQ�r.: '
' i. { .li y.: �a f4� j• ,'Ei�� !' ti4 y7.,•'t`.� ,� ,•J'"� �` t • t',t,t � .. , 17 ... ,�+� r�[ l�, y, � 1�:t.?' �. r,' �M',lft�•iL�.a';���`\ y�f� r � �'i a j ���
h, :.�Y .tt.. / ��.� s �{.F .'�.1.'�. .. �.. .. .r`'.if•!:�'� .:R r`. � �. ' yy�� _. -_. _.. �ii''{>�`v4:_-_ ! �4`:.$ff'G,�S'{: +i v-! �-... _..-.a:..
W
.0�0' oii
g'.
MU/1
08-
wl,
oPus
4. M
..V_ts,
'Wet%.
A e2
, ;do
"ie
et' e.'
oo,
evi
i.
(A. '3Z
01n•
7 r
Z4
.14
04-
'414
'464
1-4
aif Z1d 4-
0;04
� " ,IV/
�4.
- 11a.
tf I.
lic
a,9
#en" r� e0eljt�lott:10
�y
j
Wks'
/ley NC
41
ati
"T de
e(2,
1 e 4/ 44;; 17/
2v
M� f --r-� (Y -f -f C', !� � / f11•�i.- ,Irk !` ,.
�� � rff lJ.r(. _ l/ I aJr iY7.J1' �'� ' )� �• � ` `. • . �:
r"od d
/*
. ' !, I'
ax "/
I/.,, t
10
ee.
d,
If fylhl
61
_ • • � '� •> �'�� � ���a-��tf� �G��; �r-rte-1 �t :�•�. > .. `;.
of
1
'A A ^> Sr ,�� ll, r �?r�1.�J : G> c ./ . ,��y r- i �� .
'o .
61* flle a er/
4 A7e
" 77,
(OZ
X'n/ tell
6pe
:Af.
4e'
L
' .� .. � � ' .`� / /�• • Ooo��
S:Af-IPSON COUNTY NC DEEDS BOOK 6 --pp 171-173
HENRY E. 11,41cCULLOH TO JAMES McCULLOH
North Carolina
This Indenture made the Second. day
of July in the Sixteenth year of the Reign of the Sovereign
lord George the (si.c) by the grace of God of great Brittain France
and Ireland I:ing defender of the Faith &c and in the Year of Our
lord One Thousand Seven hundred and Seventy Five 1?75 Between
Henry Eustace McCulloh of the province of North Carolina in America
Esquire of the One part and James Tf�cCulloh Planter
in the said province of North Carolina of the Other Part Witnesseth
that the said Henry Eustace McCulloh for and in consideration of the
sum of
ONE HUNDRED POUNDS
proclamation money by the said James 14cCulloh to him in
hand paid at and before the Ensealing and delivery of these presents
the Receipt whereof he the said Henry Eustace McCulloh doth hereby
Acknowledge and thereof forever Exonerate and acquit him
the said Jazzes I;ZcCulloh his heirs and assigns and
for divers other considerations Hath Granted Bargained Sold
Assign Re]Leased Confirmed and set over and
P 172
and set Over and by these presents doth Grant Bargain Sell
assign Release Confirm and Set Over Unto the said James M1cCulloh
his heirs and assigns forever All that piece parcel or tract of land lying
Being and Situate in the County of Duplin and province aforesaid Beginning
at a sweet Gum On the Run of Goshen Swamp the Lower Corner .of
Henry Cannons land by the Lower end of the marsh and Run Thence
along said Cannons line South 31 West 61 pole to apine his Corner lines?
Thence along his other 1-ine North 77 West 114 pole to a dead Red Oak
his Corner thence along his other line South 28 West 218 pole to a
small pine and L'ightwood Stump in the out side marsh of Bear
Swamp thence South 45 East 116 pole to a Black Gum on
the Run of Bear Swamp thence down -the end Run as it meanders joining
said James .IcCullohs other land. to the mouth thereof thence up the
main Run of Goshen: Swamp to the Beginning and containing
in the whole
THREE HUEJDRED AND TWENTY
Acres of land. be the same mor4or les, To Have and to I•lold the
said Three Hundred rand. T orenty acres of land together with all Houses
Buildings Improvements Rights Priviladges and appurtainances
to the same in any -:rise Belonging or cappertaining and. all the Estate
Right Title and interest of him the :-_;aid IIenry Eustace %AIcCulloh his heirs
-�, and assigns of .n and -to -the sameand. every part thereof to hir-11
the said Janes ,cCullch his !heir:; and assigns forever and the said
06 'rienry : cCulloh doth hereby for hiz-:iself his heirs and. assigns Covenant
� rant and aa-ree to and %hii t1h t1le :n..L.`i Jam es . cCulloh his Heirs
,k ind. assigns that he, the said. 1Icnry °Listace I.1cCulloh now is sole law
full and Rightfull C? rrler of the a,aic! lands and premises and
that he has full and. ple power t -o ell and convey and
rzal"�e Over the same for-everfreeiro:a all Incumbrances and
,� furthez� that the scz.i-1 Jamcs I, cC;.t _1c3f1 his heirs s.izd. assigns shall
a.nd. may forever herr f ter Pe•acea'o iy and. Quietly Have Hold.
-� k, Occupy possess and. enjoy the -n.foresoid lands and premises
Davis Ccu��ty, public UbMY
�d ``' Mocksville, NC
tJ i ( .L
S:��l�ii�-'SON COUNTY NC DEEDS BOOK 6 PP 171-173
HE14RY E. 1 cCULLOH TO JAMES McCULLOH
North Carolina
This Indenture made the Second clay
of July in the Sixteenth year of the Reign of the Sovereign
lord George the (si-c) by the grace of God of great Brittain France
and Ireland King defender of the Faith &c and in the Year of Our
lord. One Thousand Seven hundred and Seventy Five 1775 Between
Henry Eustace McCulloh of the province of North Carolina in America
Esquire of the One part and James McCulloh Planter.'.
in the said province of North Carolina of the Other Part Witnesseth
that the said Henry Eustace McCulloh for and in consideration of the
sum of
ONE HUNDRED POUNDS
proclamation money by the said James McCulloh to him in
hand paid at and before the Ensealing and delivery of these presents
the Receipt whereof he the said Henry Eustace McCulloh doth hereby
Acknowledge and thereof forever Exonerate and acquit hirci
the said James McCulloh his heirs and assigns and
for divers other considerations Hath Granted Bargained Sold
Assign RelLeased Confirmed and set over and
P 172
and set Over and by these presents doth Grant Bargain Sell
assign EN5&,g-1_4 Release Confirm and Set Over Unto the said James Mculloh
his heirs and assigns forever All that piece parcel or tract of land lying
Being and Situate in the County of Duplin and province aforesaid Beginning
at a sweet Gum On the Run of Goshen Swamp the Lower Corner of
Henry Cannons land by the Lower end of the marsh and Run Thence
along said Cannons line South 31 Vilest 61 pole to apine his Corner lines?
Thence along his other line North 77 West 114 pole to a dead Red Oak
his Corner thence along his other line South 28 West 218 pole to a
small pine and Lightwood Stump in the out side marsh of Bear
Swamp thence South 45 East 116 pole to a Black Gum on
the Run of Bear Swamp thence down the -end Run as it meanders joininrc
said. James 1-1cCullohs other land. to the mouth thereof thence up the
main Run of Goshen. Swamp to the Beginning and containing
i n the whole
THREE HUNDRED AND TIVIENTY
Acres of land be the same mor4or less To Have and to 1-Iold the
said Three Hundred c,nd. T,ofenty acres of land together with all Houses-
Buildings
ousesBuildings Improvements Rights Priviledges and appurtainances
to the same in any v -rise .Belonging; or appertaining and. all the Estate
Right Title and Interest of him the ,.;Gid Henry Eustace 1,11cCulloh his hairs
and. assigns of in and -to the same: and every part thereof to hind
the said James .1cCullch his heir:_; anc3. assigns forever and the said
3-le}jry .1 cCulloh doth rerezby for hii-.1self his heirs and. assigns Covenant
grµn't and agree to and %rr t -h -the r,a.id James 111cCulloh his Hleirs
-E-Md. assigns that he the said. Henry 'Alstace.IcCulloh now i s sole la„'
full and R ightfull W--nier of the said lands and premises and
that he has full and. aatlple powe,~ -to se -11 and convey and
mal -Ce Over the same forever free ee fro:r, all Incumbrances and
further that the said. James ?.cCulloh his heirs and. assigns shall
and may forever hereafter peaceably -�.nd. Quietly Have Hold
occupy possess and. enjoy the r-i.fore sza d. lands and premises
-yy-age, L Deed Hook b pp 171-173
without any Hendrance flalestation or Incumbrances Whatso
ever the Rights and Quit Rents hereafter to grow due and
payable to his majesty King George the third his heirs and assigns
only Excepted and and Reserved also to the said
HENRY EUSTACE McCULLOH HIS HEIRS -AND
assigns the one half part of all mines and minerals Whatsoever which
may at any time be found in or upon any part of the said lands
the said Henry Eustace McCulloh doth by these presents Oblidge
himself his heirs Executors and administrators to Warrant and
Defend. him -the said James McCulloh his heirs and assigns
in the Quiet and peaceable possession of the said lands and
promises hereby granted from and against him the said Henry Eustace
McCulloh his heirs and assigns and all persons Claiming by
p 173
.f i-om or under him or them and also from and against all and
All manner of persons Whatsoever lawfully Claiming or lawfully To
'lairthe said hereby granted, premisens or any part or parcell
or Right therefo and further that he will at any time hereafter at
the
:yea sonable Request and. Charges o:L the said James 'cCulloh
his heirs or assigns make do and execute and deliver all such further,
and other act and act.; thing and. things deeds conveyances and
�
Assurances in the Law for the :getter and. more Effectually securing
an
perfecting the Estate ?tight and. Title of the said James I:IcCulloh his
� C-",
heirs and asci; ns at in arca. to the aforesaid. lands and premises
forever as by him or -them or any of them or his or them or any of
a u
their Counel•-:Yearned in the Law shall be Reasonable advised devised
��n
or :required
C= -�
IN 1ITiti'ESS WHLrtir;OF I THE St'..i U
v �
Henry ?ustace 1 -1cCulloh have 'Hereunto set his hand and seal of
.®
Ar -.-,is the day and year full above written
1GNED SEALED
Henry Eustace McCulloh (seal)
released in the presence of)
.Alexa nd*er icCulloh ) Thomas Frohock
li.11iam Frohock )
I -'el ix Kenan )
Received. -the day and year within written
of and from the within Named James I.icCulloh the said Sum of (sic)
Leing the consideration money within mentioned to be paid to me
Witness Felix Kenan
Wm- Frohock } Henry Eustace I4icCulloh (seal)
Alexander r:IcCulloh } State of North Carolina
Duplin County July Court One Thousand
Seven Hundred and seventy Eight 1778 Then was the within deed from
Henry Eustace McCulloh to James IfcCulloh proved in Open Court by the
Oath of Felix Kenan One of the subscribing witnesses thereto and Ordered
to be Registered Witness William Dickson Clk. of our aforesaid County
William Dickson Clk
State of North Carolina
Duplin County Registered in the Registers office &*' the aforesaid
County in Book letter Pages 141 142 and 143 By Me
the 19th day of September 1783
Richard Clinton Peg.
3
THE HONOURABLE SOCIETY OF THE MIDDLE TEMPLE
Miss E. McNeill, BA DLS ATCL ALA The Library
Librarian & Keeper of the Records Middle Temple, London EC4Y 9BT
Telephone 01-353 4303
INQ/NIC/KJ -
20 July 1981 2 J U L 198
Mr
W J F Fenton
82 Hersham Road
Walton -on -Thames
Surrey KT12 5NU
Dear Mr Fenton
I refer to your letter of 24 June concerning Henry Eustace McCulloh.
There was a member of this Inn of that name. He was admitted to Middle
Temple on 27 June 1757 and called to the Bar on 20 June 1760. He was
the only son of Henry McCulloh of Turnham Green, Middlesex, described
as 'esq'. This is all we have on him as our records are of the Inn
rather than of individual members of it and anything we have on them is
as it concerns their association with the Inn.
The phrase 'regularly called to the Bar' seems strange. As I am sure
you are aware, call to the Bar is the conferring on suitably qualified
students of the degree of barrister -at -law, enabling them to practise
as barristers. So this only occurs once.
If you wish to know what chambers he may have been in, you could look
at the relevant law lists which are available in the main reference
libraries.
Yours sincerely
o
l
�
a
U
�
a
d
L
CJ.
Davie County Public Library
Mocksvilie, NC